1999 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1989 Lotus Carlton
To start off, 1999 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Lotus Carlton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Lotus Carlton would be higher. At 3,615 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Lotus Carlton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Lotus Carlton. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Jeep Cherokee. (194 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Jeep Cherokee. 1999 Jeep Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1989 Lotus Carlton has manual transmission. 1989 Lotus Carlton will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Jeep Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Jeep Cherokee | 1989 Lotus Carlton | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | Cherokee | Carlton |
Year Released | 1999 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2464 cc | 3615 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 194 Nm | 569 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2750 mm |