1999 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1999 Jeep Cherokee. (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1999 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 40 kg more than 1999 Jeep Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Jeep Cherokee. (194 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Jeep Cherokee | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cherokee | Outlander |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2464 cc | 2343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 194 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.3 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2630 mm |