1999 Jeep Commander vs. 1992 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1999 Jeep Commander is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Cougar would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Jeep Commander weights approximately 648 kg more than 1992 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1999 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Jeep Commander | 1992 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Jeep | Mercury |
| Model | Commander | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1992 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2268 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1860 mm |
