1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,125 cc (5 cylinders), 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee (138 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 680 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee (384 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Jeep | Triumph |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 2000 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3125 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 384 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |