1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,125 cc (5 cylinders), 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee (138 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 380 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Suzuki F1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee (384 Nm) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | F1 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3125 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 384 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2210 mm |
