1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2005 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,955 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee (187 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B3000. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 248 kg more than 2005 Mazda B3000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee (295 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B3000. (240 Nm). This means 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2005 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Grand Cherokee | B3000 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3955 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 295 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.6 mm | 80 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1552 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 74 L |