1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 630 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Grand Cherokee | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3678 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1585 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2550 mm |