1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 640 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Grand Cherokee | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 218 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3678 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1585 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2550 mm |