1999 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Jeep Wrangler (184 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 152 kg more than 1999 Jeep Wrangler.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Jeep Wrangler. (290 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Jeep Wrangler | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | Wrangler | Celica |
Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 622 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1458 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 87 L |