1999 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1999 Jeep Wrangler. (184 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1999 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 145 kg more than 2006 Acura CSX.
Because 1999 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Acura CSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Jeep Wrangler | 2006 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Jeep | Acura |
| Model | Wrangler | CSX |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 184 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1458 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2700 mm |
