1999 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Jeep Wrangler (184 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ranger.
Because 1999 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Jeep Wrangler (290 Nm @ 2950 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1999 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Jeep Wrangler | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Jeep | Ford |
Model | Wrangler | Ranger |
Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2950 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3193 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 74 L |