1999 Kia Avella vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1999 Kia Avella is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1999 Kia Avella. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1999 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 742 kg more than 1999 Kia Avella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Kia Avella | 1966 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Kia | Mercury |
Model | Avella | Cougar |
Year Released | 1999 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 6392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 918 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2830 mm |