1999 Kia Clarus vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Kia Clarus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Kia Clarus would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Kia Clarus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Kia Clarus (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Kia Clarus should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Clio weights approximately 410 kg more than 1999 Kia Clarus.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Kia Clarus (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1999 Kia Clarus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Kia Clarus | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Kia | Renault |
Model | Clarus | Clio |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2580 mm |