1999 Kia Elan vs. 1952 Mercury Monterey
To start off, 1999 Kia Elan is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Mercury Monterey. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Mercury Monterey would be higher. At 4,191 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Mercury Monterey is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Mercury Monterey weights approximately 612 kg more than 1999 Kia Elan.
Because 1952 Mercury Monterey is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Mercury Monterey. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Kia Elan | 1952 Mercury Monterey | |
| Make | Kia | Mercury |
| Model | Elan | Monterey |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 4191 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1068 kg | 1680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3000 mm |
