1999 Kia Elan vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1999 Kia Elan is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Kia Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Kia Elan (149 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan.
Because 1965 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Kia Elan | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Kia | Lotus |
Model | Elan | Elan |
Year Released | 1999 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |