1999 Kia Elan vs. 2002 Rover 75
To start off, 2002 Rover 75 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Kia Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Kia Elan would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Kia Elan (149 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2002 Rover 75. (122 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 2002 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Rover 75 weights approximately 407 kg more than 1999 Kia Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Kia Elan (186 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Rover 75. (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Kia Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Kia Elan | 2002 Rover 75 | |
Make | Kia | Rover |
Model | Elan | 75 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1068 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2830 mm |