1999 Kia Retona vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 1999 Kia Retona is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1999 Kia Retona. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1999 Kia Retona.
Because 1999 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Lotus Etna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Kia Retona. (205 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Kia Retona.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Kia Retona | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
Make | Kia | Lotus |
Model | Retona | Etna |
Year Released | 1999 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 331 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 205 Nm | 408 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 95.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 69.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2520 mm |