1999 Kia Rio vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1999 Kia Rio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (160 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1999 Kia Rio. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1999 Kia Rio.
Because 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Kia Rio. (121 Nm). This means 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Kia Rio | 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Kia | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Rio | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1343 cc | 3344 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 121 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2670 mm |
