1999 Lada 111 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1999 Lada 111 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1999 Lada 111. (70 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1999 Lada 111. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lada 111 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Lada 111. (115 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Lada 111.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Lada 111 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Lada | Mazda |
| Model | 111 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 57 L |
