1999 Lada 111 vs. 1984 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1999 Lada 111 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,473 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1999 Lada 111. (70 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1999 Lada 111.
Because 1984 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Lada 111, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Lada 111. (115 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1984 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Lada 111.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Lada 111 | 1984 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Lada | Chevrolet |
Model | 111 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1999 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2580 mm |