1999 Lada 111 vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lada 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lada 111 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Lada 111 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lada 111 (70 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lada 111 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lada 111 (115 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 Lada 111 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Lada 111 | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lada | Renault |
Model | 111 | Clio |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 50 L |