1999 Lada Samara II vs. 2003 Proton 400
To start off, 2003 Proton 400 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lada Samara II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lada Samara II would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Lada Samara II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Proton 400 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1999 Lada Samara II. (67 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 1999 Lada Samara II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lada Samara II (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Lada Samara II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Lada Samara II | 2003 Proton 400 | |
Make | Lada | Proton |
Model | Samara II | 400 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2510 mm |