1999 Lamborghini Diablo vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1999 Lamborghini Diablo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 5,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 Lamborghini Diablo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lamborghini Diablo (550 HP) has 457 more horse power than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lamborghini Diablo should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lamborghini Diablo (640 Nm) has 491 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. (149 Nm). This means 1999 Lamborghini Diablo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Lamborghini Diablo | 1981 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Lamborghini | Mazda |
Model | Diablo | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1999 | 1981 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5990 cc | 1768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 550 HP | 93 HP |
Torque | 640 Nm | 149 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2620 mm |