1999 Lancia Delta vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lancia Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lancia Delta would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 405 more horse power than 1999 Lancia Delta. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1999 Lancia Delta.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Lancia Delta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 483 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Lancia Delta. (147 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Lancia Delta. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 1999 Lancia Delta has manual transmission. 1999 Lancia Delta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Lancia Delta | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
| Make | Lancia | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Delta | CLS |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 507 HP |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 630 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
