1999 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1964 Mini MK I
To start off, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mini MK I would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Mini MK I. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Mini MK I. (60 Nm). This means 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Mini MK I. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1964 Mini MK I has manual transmission. 1964 Mini MK I will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Land Rover Range Rover | 1964 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mini |
| Model | Range Rover | MK I |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4554 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2040 mm |
