1999 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Volvo 145. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 145. (157 Nm). This means 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 145.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Land Rover Range Rover | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Land Rover | Volvo |
Model | Range Rover | 145 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4554 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |