1999 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1976 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Datsun 280Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Datsun 280Z. (221 Nm). This means 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Datsun 280Z. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1976 Datsun 280Z has manual transmission. 1976 Datsun 280Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Land Rover Range Rover | 1976 Datsun 280Z | |
Make | Land Rover | Datsun |
Model | Range Rover | 280Z |
Year Released | 1999 | 1976 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4554 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 221 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4399 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2304 mm |