1999 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1982 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 286 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. (121 Nm). This means 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1982 Nissan Bluebird has manual transmission. 1982 Nissan Bluebird will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Land Rover Range Rover | 1982 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Range Rover | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4554 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 121 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2530 mm |