1999 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5
To start off, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. (353 Nm). This means 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Land Rover Range Rover | 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 | |
Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
Model | Range Rover | FCHV 5 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4554 cc | 2981 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 2720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2860 mm |