1999 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo

To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Renault Kangoo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (151 Nm). This means 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Kangoo. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2003 Renault Kangoo has manual transmission. 2003 Renault Kangoo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Land Rover Range Rover 2003 Renault Kangoo
Make Land Rover Renault
Model Range Rover Kangoo
Year Released 1999 2003
Body Type SUV Panel Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4554 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 97 HP
Torque 407 Nm 151 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 4050 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1800 mm 1840 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2610 mm