1999 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2004 Maybach 62
To start off, 2004 Maybach 62 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 5,513 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Maybach 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Maybach 62 (900 Nm) has 493 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Land Rover Range Rover. (407 Nm). This means 2004 Maybach 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Land Rover Range Rover | 2004 Maybach 62 | |
Make | Land Rover | Maybach |
Model | Range Rover | 62 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4554 cc | 5513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 542 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 900 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 6170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3830 mm |