1999 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2005 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 2005 Nissan R 390 GT1 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher.
Because 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Nissan R 390 GT1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Land Rover Range Rover. (407 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Land Rover Range Rover. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2005 Nissan R 390 GT1 has manual transmission. 2005 Nissan R 390 GT1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Land Rover Range Rover | 2005 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
| Model | Range Rover | R 390 GT1 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 543 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 637 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2730 mm |
