1999 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 170 more horse power than 1999 Land Rover Range Rover. (187 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1999 Land Rover Range Rover.
Because 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Land Rover Range Rover. (320 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Land Rover Range Rover | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | Land Rover | Holden |
Model | Range Rover | UTE |
Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3946 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |