1999 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2011 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2011 Nissan Juke is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Juke. (240 Nm). This means 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Juke.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Land Rover Range Rover | 2011 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Range Rover | Juke |
Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4554 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 188 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2530 mm |