1999 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2012 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2012 Dodge Charger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Charger (637 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Land Rover Range Rover. (407 Nm). This means 2012 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Land Rover Range Rover | 2012 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Land Rover | Dodge |
Model | Range Rover | Charger |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4554 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 470 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 637 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5088 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1885 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3053 mm |