1999 Lincoln Continental vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1999 Lincoln Continental is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lincoln Continental (217 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 980 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lincoln Continental (372 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Lincoln Continental | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Lincoln | Zastava |
Model | Continental | 102 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 372 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5300 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2160 mm |