1999 Lincoln Continental vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lincoln Continental (217 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (45 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 910 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lincoln Continental (372 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1999 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Lincoln Continental | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Lincoln | Subaru |
Model | Continental | R2 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 372 Nm | 58 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5300 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 30 L |