1999 Lincoln Continental vs. 2010 Holden Calais

To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1999 Lincoln Continental. (217 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1999 Lincoln Continental.

Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lincoln Continental (372 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 1999 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Calais.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Lincoln Continental 2010 Holden Calais
Make Lincoln Holden
Model Continental Calais
Year Released 1999 2010
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4601 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 217 HP 278 HP
Torque 372 Nm 350 Nm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors