1999 Lincoln Continental vs. 2010 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1999 Lincoln Continental. (217 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1999 Lincoln Continental.

Because 2010 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lincoln Continental (372 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 1999 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore. 1999 Lincoln Continental has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Lincoln Continental will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: