1999 Lincoln LS vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1999 Lincoln LS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,934 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lincoln LS weights approximately 384 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1999 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Lincoln LS | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Lincoln | Oldsmobile |
| Model | LS | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3934 cc | 2568 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 249 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2680 mm |
