1999 Lincoln LS vs. 2000 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lincoln LS weights approximately 272 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 1999 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler Sebring has automatic transmission and 1999 Lincoln LS has manual transmission. 1999 Lincoln LS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler Sebring will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Lincoln LS | 2000 Chrysler Sebring | |
| Make | Lincoln | Chrysler |
| Model | LS | Sebring |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1652 kg | 1380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2640 mm |
