1999 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1999 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,498 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 739 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lotec C 1000 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Lotec C 1000 | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Lotec | Lotus |
| Model | C 1000 | Elan |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5498 cc | 1556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 843 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1150 mm |
