1999 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1995 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1999 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 5,498 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 735 more horse power than 1995 Nissan Pulsar. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1995 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1999 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 842 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Nissan Pulsar. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Lotec C 1000 | 1995 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Lotec | Nissan |
Model | C 1000 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1999 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5498 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1400 mm |