1999 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2003 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 2003 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,498 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 727 more horse power than 2003 Nissan Terrano II. (116 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2003 Nissan Terrano II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 546 kg more than 1999 Lotec C 1000.
Because 2003 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Lotec C 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 793 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Nissan Terrano II. (197 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Nissan Terrano II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Lotec C 1000 | 2003 Nissan Terrano II | |
| Make | Lotec | Nissan |
| Model | C 1000 | Terrano II |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5498 cc | 2389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 843 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 990 Nm | 197 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1626 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1860 mm |
