1999 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,498 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 695 more horse power than 2005 Rover 75. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2005 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rover 75 weights approximately 335 kg more than 1999 Lotec C 1000.
Because 1999 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 775 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Lotec C 1000 | 2005 Rover 75 | |
Make | Lotec | Rover |
Model | C 1000 | 75 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5498 cc | 1796 cc |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1415 kg |