1999 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,498 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 685 more horse power than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1999 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 771 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Lotec C 1000 | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Lotec | Toyota |
Model | C 1000 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5498 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1549 mm |