1999 Lotus M250 vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Lotus M250 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotus M250 (247 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (148 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Renault Clio weights approximately 50 kg more than 1999 Lotus M250.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotus M250 (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1999 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Lotus M250 | 1993 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lotus | Renault |
Model | M250 | Clio |
Year Released | 1999 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 321 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1400 mm |