1999 Lotus M250 vs. 1997 Rover 414i
To start off, 1999 Lotus M250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 414i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 414i would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotus M250 (247 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Rover 414i weights approximately 510 kg more than 1999 Lotus M250.
Because 1999 Lotus M250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lotus M250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Rover 414i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotus M250 (321 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 414i. (167 Nm). This means 1999 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 414i.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Lotus M250 | 1997 Rover 414i | |
| Make | Lotus | Rover |
| Model | M250 | 414i |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2946 cc | 1399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 321 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1460 kg |
