1999 Lotus M250 vs. 2004 Mazda 2

To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lotus M250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lotus M250 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotus M250 (247 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (79 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1999 Lotus M250.

Because 1999 Lotus M250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lotus M250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotus M250 (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 2. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Lotus M250 2004 Mazda 2
Make Lotus Mazda
Model M250 2
Year Released 1999 2004
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 2946 cc 1388 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 247 HP 79 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 321 Nm 124 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 950 kg 1125 kg
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 3930 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1550 mm