1999 Lotus M250 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lotus M250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lotus M250 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotus M250 (247 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 275 kg more than 1999 Lotus M250.
Because 1999 Lotus M250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lotus M250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotus M250 (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1999 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Lotus M250 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | M250 | 3 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 321 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1470 mm |